No doubt CGPT can be used in this manner, but one has to know what one is doing in the first place. Someone asked the AI the other day who the first scientist was and CGPT told him is was Thales of Miletus. This response is of course arguable, and troubled by anachronism. But users without the training to know better will walk away believing they are in possession of a fact. Consequently, I see CGPT as an awful tool that will lead to a barbaric sense of what knowledge is. That said, you do a great job here at leveraging some potential.
No doubt CGPT can be used in this manner, but one has to know what one is doing in the first place. Someone asked the AI the other day who the first scientist was and CGPT told him is was Thales of Miletus. This response is of course arguable, and troubled by anachronism. But users without the training to know better will walk away believing they are in possession of a fact. Consequently, I see CGPT as an awful tool that will lead to a barbaric sense of what knowledge is. That said, you do a great job here at leveraging some potential.